RE: Open architecture for recording/editing Macros, etc.

["Dov Isaacs" <isaacs@xxxxxxxxx>]

The only problem with Windows NT 4 is that it is Type 1 font and
PostScript brain-dead. That liability was fixed with Windows 2000.
In other words, I would not recommend Windows NT 4 for any publishing
endeavors, but whole-heartedly recommend Windows 2000. And Windows 2000
is many orders of magnitude more reliable than Windows'9x/Me.

        - Dov


At 2/8/2001 10:27 PM, Dick Gaskill wrote:
>Been using FM and other tools on both NT and Unix for a long time.
>Currently use only NT.  Works fine.  Cannot imagine why anyone would say it
>isn't a good platform for publishing.  Also don't recall any Adobe people
>saying anything negative about NT, but something could've slipped by (lotsa
>messages on this list).  
>
>Dov, your comments regarding that would be appreciated here.
>
>Re Macros, you can do this on NT, but you need either a 3rd party app or a
>programmable keyboard such as the Avant Stellar.
>
>-dg


** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com **
** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body.   **